causeandeffectworld.com Blog
getting to the bottom of things…
Politics | Current Events | Stuff
Trying to make sense of things by looking at causes and understanding their effects. Using science to discern what's real and relationships to determine what's of value. Curious about everything. www.samanthaclemens.com- Middle East - Since America was the only superpower, we should seize the opportunity to reshape the Middle East to our advantage, secure the oil resources, install democracy.
- Europe - Allies are nice, but unnecessary given our military strength. Proceed unilaterally if they do not fall in line.
- Latin America - Only pay attention if they are an irritant, i.e. immigrants from Mexico, aggressive rhetoric from Venezuela.
- China - Pressure them to stop supporting their exchange rate to make American exports more competitive. Occasionally mention human rights abuses.
- Africa – Does it exist? Darfur?
- Education – Pass a law to transform education, but do not fund it. Brother of President has better approach in Florida.
- Tax – Cut taxes for wealthiest. When economic growth increases, give credit to the tax cut while ignoring the boom in housing market fueled by low interest rates which has put cash into economy as homeowners cash out and take on more debt. Ignore national debt and growing economic inequality.
- Debt – Ignore national debt. Cut social programs for most vulnerable citizens to reduce debt while cutting taxes on wealthiest. Smile at your kids, who will be paying the debt.
- Balance of payments – Don’t mention that we buy more from strangers than we sell. Or that China is lending us the money. Or that one of our largest exports is Hollywood movies. Which is the root of all that is bad in the country.
- Citizen contribution to war – Shop! (buying more of that stuff we buy from strangers, which hurts our balance of payments).
- Gay marriage – Predict the breakdown of our society if gay marriage is allowed without providing any concrete evidence that it would happen other than it is new.
- Environment – Use it. Scientists will figure out how to fix anything we break (not scientists studying climate change, who of course can’t be trusted).
- Embryonic stem cell research – Disseminate incorrect information about the possibilities of adult stem cell research. Limit research and funding. Ignore advice of country’s top scientists.
- Abortion – Support efforts to limit availability of abortion within the United States and internationally.
- Divided government - Americans will not permit one-party rule at the federal level again for years to come. If Dems get both House and Senate, look for a Republican President in two years. If Repubs keep Senate, Presidential race is a toss-up.
- New realism, or ‘anti-hubrism’ - Americans are beginning to see that the ‘war on terror’ is not a conventional one, that our approach must be ‘unconventional,’ and we cannot be distracted by ‘opportunities’ to reshape the world, like we were in Iraq.
- Allies are good - Iraq shows that America’s military can break countries. We are learning the hard way that it cannot build them. We need allies to help with military action, post-war reconstruction, multi-lateral relations, business partners. Condi has begun this process, but the Bush administration has no political capital to use with potential allies, so the process will be slow until we have a new President in Jan ’09. The era of ‘you are with us or you are against us’ is over.
- Embracing globalization - While globalization is inevitable, the less contact people have with outsiders, the more they are likely to resist globalization. Furthermore, the more people are negatively affected by the global economy, the more they will resist. Americans are coming to understand the inevitability of globalization, but it will take leadership to prepare the country to embrace it and be competitive.
- Security through engagement - The more economically and socially integrated countries are with each other, the less likely they are to be at war. Through trade – globalization – we reduce the risk of war. To trade, you must establish mutual trust and respect. The hard-nosed rhetoric of the Bush administration and hard-right anti-immigrationists does not promote these relationships. The business community will continue to push back to protect their international interests.
- Morality redefined - The majority of Americans want to be free to make their own moral choices on social issues, such as gay marriage and abortion. This is consistent with the rest of the world – countries with flourishing economies practice the two-foundation morality described in our post Who are more Moral? Liberals or Conservatives? which is focused on harm and justice/reciprocity more consistent with liberals and in some cases libertarians. See Moral Intuitions in the comments.
A Turning Point
For 26 years, America has been voting for Republicans, and the conservative agenda has carried the day, with the following themes:
Foreign Policy
Domestic Policy
If the polls and predictions are right, this election will be a turning point, signaling a new direction for the country. Democrats are poised to take over the House of Representatives, increase number of seats in Senate, and win many state Governorships and congressional races.
What changed?
The tipping point seemed to be Katrina – Americans saw government playing a critical role in the effort — and failing miserably at all levels. Before Katrina, criticism of the Bush administration was muted in some quarters out of loyalty to the troops and country during a time of war. However, criticism of the Katrina disaster required no such restraint, and it was fast and furious. The fury quickly spilled over to other arenas, including the war in Iraq.
What themes will be prevalent going forward? Here are some thoughts…
Stay tuned.
November 12th, 2006 at 1:43 pm
Well since Samantha wrote that piece, we have actually gone through the midterm elections and the Democrats did far better than anyone had expected. Most of the pundits had long anticipated the Democrats winning the House of Representative but only a few pundits thought they stood a chance at taking the Senate. At the very minimum, Bush is now most definitely a lame duck, and he is almost as likely to receive blame from members of his own party, as he is from the Democrats, for anything that goes wrong in the US over the next couple of years. I suspect that Republicans looking forward to 2008 will continue to make efforts to distance themselves from the Bush Administration.
To address some of Samantha’s points. We will be having divided government for at least the next couple of years, and possibly a lot longer than that. How that will impinge on actual public policy though remains uncertain. In the US, bi-partisanship has often been used to push through policies that while beneficial to the more affluent classes in American society, are not necessarily so good for everyone else. Back in the Clinton years, trade legislation like NAFTA and GATT, along with other measures like the abolition of AFDC were pushed through Congress in the name of bi-partisanship. In the sphere of foreign policy, most of this country’s wars, including the so-called “war on terror,” and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been conducted in the name of bi-partisanship. The Democrats until very recently, for the most part, embraced the Iraq War and even when, as during the recent election cycle, make seemingly antiwar noises, they are always very careful to avoid saying what they would do differently. One of the few true things that Bush said during the recent campaign, was that the Democrats do not have an alternative policy to his concerning the war.
I think that Samantha is correct concerning the revival of “realism” in US foreign policy. The Kissinger-Scowcroft wing of the GOP which had played such a prominent role in the elder Bush’s administration and which had been all but shutout during the current Bush’s administration, seems to be inching back to a more prominent role. The newly formed Baker-Hamilton commission for investigating the Iraq War is one sign of this. The resignation of Donald Rumsfeld is still another sign as well. For all intents and purposes the US has lost the Iraq War, and is now struggling to find a way out. This has very profound implications for future US policy concerning the Middle East, especially when taken in conjunction with the defeat of Isarel in last summer’s war in Lebanon. I would submit that while an attack on Iran still cannot be excluded, such an attack is less likely than seemed the case several months ago. Both Iraq and Lebanon have shown up the limits of US and Israeli military power. To the extent that the new realism restrains the use of US military power in the future, that in my book will be a good thing.